Sunday, February 21, 2010

Reflection on Computer Assisted Language Learning by Mark Warschauer

Warschauer (1996) states that Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) has become more and more popular in language teaching and learning. There are 3 phases of CALL, which are behavioristic CALL, communicative CALL and integrative CALL. The development of the 3 phases actually follows the changes of Second Language and Teaching. Behavoristic CALL actually focuses on learning through behaviorism. Repetitive drilling is the main issue using CALL. As educators claimed that a purpose should exist when language learning takes place, communicative CALL followed, which focuses on using and understanding the language. A number of games were developed in order to give stimulus leading to the use and discussion of the language. Integrative CALL is the third phase that focuses on using the language for project based learning. Different means of giving and receiving feedbacks could be done by using different online systems so that learners could benefit from the process of doing the project work.

I agree that computers should be used in different ways to facilitate learning. Each CALL plays an important role in language learning. For instances, behavioristic CALL serves best in giving repetitive practices or drillings for learners, which is needed in the early stage of learning; Communicative CALL helps learners understand the use of language better.

I also agree with Warschauer (1996) that we, teachers, should not depend too much on CALL as it is not a method of teaching. It is only a tool in the process of learning and teaching even it could help shorten the time of searching information, giving online feedbacks, locating resources or initiating discussion.

4 comments:

  1. I agree with you that behavioristic CALL is needed in the early stage of learning, but for advanced learners, they still need to do some repetitive practices to continue their vocabulary learning and accurate listening practise.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, it is important for us as teachers not to ignore such a CALL and specially the behaviouristic one as and based our dailly practices we still need to go over n over again with our students.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Although teachers have a broad range of choice of CALL technologies, it remains a challenge to fit them into a conventional curriculum. Teachers are now facing such a challenge, as they receive not much support from others. It will be a long-term evolution to develop an appropriate CALL tech for a particular cohort of students.

    ReplyDelete